1,201

(39 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I'm going to take a blind guess that Kraftwerk are not mentioned for the same reason as Moroder and Hot Butter, they popularized synths to a point that I expect most people to know what tracks made them important, etc.

Have some Bruce Haack


This: http://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/2588/ … e-burnout/

inb4 polk audio

To OP: Though Reformat the Planet doco is the closest I can think of to a proper explanation of where the music came from, I'm not aware of a definitive book that describes this little set of electronic music (relative to, say, a biography of Kraftwerk, which would be a better read anyway. wink )

If you want to learn about the instruments there are books on synthesis but it's much easier (and most of the people called "good") learn slowly through personal experimentation. Hope that was useful

1,204

(50 replies, posted in Sega)


This thread is now fixed.

1,205

(175 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Subway Sonicbeat wrote:

Calling off the uni about her tefth is pretty much morally debatable. Not that I care.

In academia, plagiarism of any kind is grounds for expulsion and while it's career threatening, why shouldn't it be? Not doing your own homework is cheating.

This would be a non-problem if she said that she is a DJ playing the music of others (which is something this sort of music needs more of) instead of pretending to have created something that she didn't.

At least TDS tried to seem athletic when "performing..."

I agree that there would be less plagiarism if people knew how music (any music, really) is made.

That is indeed quite awesome

Bonus for posting the demo's code in its entirety.

Unfollowing.  Thanks for the notice.

A part of me thinks he's joking but it's not funny and never will be.

1,209

(22 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I forgot to answer most important part of OP: my measurable audience are 25-35 yo males in many countries, strongest results in US, Canada, Germany, Japan, and UK. (That's where I got "spread thinly" from)

1,210

(22 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I'm glad the right people have answered on this thread, and hope I'm adding something useful by saying:

Speaking mostly for myself, the chipmusic audience is spread very thinly around the world and is occasionally on the socially introverted side, so if you're in this gig/art to make money you are probably barking up the wrong tree.

In the places where there are regular gigs and big festivals, I have a lot of respect for the hard work (and hard-earned funds) put in to create them, so much thanks to the people that make it possible.

1,211

(18 replies, posted in Audio Production)

What Wizwars and OP said, relating to my own stuff, sounds like everyone is doing it right.

When I use guitar it is usually very soft on purpose but it's the same idea- I mess with pan and EQ (and compression) until I can put it where it sounds nice in the mix. This is true about blending any instrument in really.

1,212

(15 replies, posted in General Discussion)

The opposite of "remove one-third of a song" is to take your favorite song and add a section to it.

You can give yourself any number of deliberate limits for creating a song, you can also make only one section or one fragment of a song and pass it to a friend to add the next bit (and so on,) or there are those gigantic module files that a dozen composers will pass around until they get sick of it or reach the pattern limit; I think I remember Brian Eno saying he had a drill where he'd make the band members exchange instruments- the key in all these drills is to make sure that you are uncomfortable in some way and that causes you to create something you wouldn't normally do.

1,213

(15 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Hitori Tori says that all his tunes are constructed from previously composed fragments:

And I once made this:
http://soundcloud.com/chunter/geocache-release-zero-mix

from this:
http://soundcloud.com/chunter/geocache-prototype-mix

But just as there is no real set pattern for where your ideas should come from (and you should be willing to mix things up all the time to keep your writing fresh) there are no rules for what to do with a revisited piece as long as you think the new piece is better.

An exercise I had to do once in school- remove one third from the song (you've written) that you like the most and record it that way.  Most people come out of the exercise liking the song better.  (Not recommended if you write like ant1, nothing personal.)

1,214

(295 replies, posted in General Discussion)

10k wrote:

We should be celebrating the fact that a few dudes can pull this thing off and that we can be there... ...Don't take this awesome event for granted!

...

Sure there are more that deserve to be on the bill... but there are more people who deserve to be played on radio, playing regular shows and getting listened to by heaps of people. Sometimes there is only so much space.

Some thoughts I have already shared on the subject elsewhere:

"Do you expect them to pass a DMG through the audience so everybody gets to play?"

"Nobody complains that they don't get a turn at Coachella."

"If apathy continues it will go away."

If a disgruntled reader hopes for the event to improve it must be supported, otherwise, we will have to hope for a rival event, and I can't think of a single person who can accomplish that anytime soon.

1,215

(24 replies, posted in Bugs and Requests)