i think this license is very harmful and bad
i hope you aren't using it
if you are using it, WHY are you using it
Offline
uhajdafdfdfa
Offline
New York City
ant1 wrote:
i think this license is very harmful and bad
Start by explaining why it would be bad.
Offline
uhajdafdfdfa
isn't it obvious why is bad? no one can make derivatives of your song...
Offline
Chicago IL
akira^8GB wrote:
ant1 wrote:i think this license is very harmful and bad
Start by explaining why it would be bad.
it's an ant1 thread you don't have to take it seriously
Offline
Savannah, Georgia
Saskrotch wrote:
it's an ant1 thread you don't have to take it seriously
Offline
uhajdafdfdfa
what a shitty forum i can't wait for 8bc to come back
Offline
ant1 being a "grumpyboots" what is this
Last edited by Je Mappelle (May 6, 2012 7:50 pm)
Offline
AANABAY01
I agree with ant1 and you do have to take it seriously
Offline
Russia, Moscow
Serious or not, but I'm agree with ant1 on this. The ND license hurts the artist itself - no remixes or covers, no extra publicity (see classic video game music with all these covers as an example). Not to mention that in case with music it conflicts with the US law that allows cover versions without getting a permission from the original artist himself.
Offline
Brunswick, GA USA
An allegedly more serious blog asked, what is the difference between NC-ND (non commercial, no derivs) and conventional copyright? I see his point but at the same time, I think a person choosing that sort of thing wants the material to be freely available (and free to copy and share) under the condition that it be presented in an expected way without having to contact the artist first; otherwise, that person indeed wants all the other rights in copyright law.
If you want and expect derivs, it should also be easy to get the sources and individual instrument without needing to ask the artist for them.
A little more detail here http://createdigitalmusic.com/2010/10/c … -addendum/
Last edited by chunter (May 6, 2012 9:30 pm)
Offline
Norway
I tried to change the licensing of my tracks just now since I noticed I hadn't put much thought into it, and all my tracks have different licenses. But it seems I don't have that option. Or, am I doing it wrong?
Offline
Gosford, Australia
isn't SA very similar to ND? or am i understanding it in the wrong way?
Offline
montreal, qc
it's a very interesting tag. one would think if you cared enough about ND, you would just exercise your copyright.
Offline
Brunswick, GA USA
share-alike is like the GPL in software: it says "if you make something from this, you must use the same licensing." In this case, something marked NC would be NC in its remixes too
Offline
uhajdafdfdfa
Victory Road wrote:
isn't SA very similar to ND? or am i understanding it in the wrong way?
share alike means if you share derivative works, they have to be under the same or similar license
ND means you cannot share derivative works