113

(28 replies, posted in General Discussion)

n00bstar wrote:

As far as similarities with other arpeggios in more traditional music, I think the chip arp stands on its own. The original intention of arpeggios in classical music was more along the lines of not wanting to put a chord with all notes played simultaneously and give more movement to a part but retain a certain simplicity because layering too many "unique" melodies over one another can become chaotic quickly. Whereas the original intention of the chip arp is kind of the opposite, you WANT to have a chord, but you just don't have the means to do it. Of course overtime it became such a staple sound that people when beyond emulating chords and started using them fairly creatively.

Well, you could think of the super fast arp as overcoming voice limit of early computers; you could also look at it as overcoming human physical limits, which was previously impossible. I'm sure many of the early examples of fast apps were on modular systems, and people probably got a kick out of the sound of very fast chords. Especially for prog rock or metal, I could see fast arps fitting into their aesthetic.

martin_demsky wrote:

I purchased nanoloop iOS version long time ago, but never used it because of lack of commands and realtime automation recording while modifying sliders, lsdj in that area is much deeper.

That's a legit criticism of older versions of Nanoloop, but the current version allows per-step automation for each parameter. It's more like nanoloop for gameboy. It doesn't record sliders, but you can have a lot of control over variations.

Granted LSDJ is the most flexible, but the FM sounds, and samples in the nanoloop app are very nice.

I don't have a ton of experience with Android, but Mobile Nanoloop has really grown on me.

116

(3 replies, posted in Releases)

Ok, how to turn this into a cracked copy of Cubase? Plz help. tongue



★★★★★

117

(9 replies, posted in Circuit Bending)

Here's a video of my PSS-460 in action. It makes the best beats when no one is in the room. Pretty crazy sounding.

118

(329 replies, posted in Nintendo Handhelds)

!!!!!!

119

(329 replies, posted in Nintendo Handhelds)

oliver wrote:

I personally prefer a soft, flat kick, however, here's a short loop with some pitch bending applied to kicks and the stutter function in use:

http://www.nanoloop.com/mono/nlmono5.mp3

Breakthrough stuff in here. Total unique instrument. Nice work.

120

(329 replies, posted in Nintendo Handhelds)

oliver wrote:

I personally prefer a soft, flat kick, however, here's a short loop with some pitch bending applied to kicks and the stutter function in use:

http://www.nanoloop.com/mono/nlmono5.mp3

Breakthrough stuff in here. Total unique instrument. Nice work.

121

(4 replies, posted in Releases)

very good (obviously)

122

(9 replies, posted in Circuit Bending)

PSS-470? Think that's what it's called...

Nope PSS-460:

Hers some sounds from it.

https://www.freesound.org/people/color% … nds/86800/


https://www.freesound.org/people/color% … nds/85502/

MORE INFO: It seems to use YM3812 chip, also used in adlib sound card. So it's FM. That keyboard has a little little drum computer, and you can short circuit the rhythm chip to other things, and make the bend sound rhythmic, as heard in the first sample above. The rhythm modulates the settings on the operators in the FM chip.  The other bend fucks with the CPU.

I bought it at goodwill, 6 years ago, for $24.00. Now they're on eBay for $70~100. Score. Probably won't sell it though.

123

(2 replies, posted in General Discussion)

It's on archive.org
https://archive.org/details/BBS.The.Documentary

Hey this is also a good movie, about hackers in the 80's - 90's.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77ILA5Cso3w

my.Explosion wrote:

(I) hate communities that kind of enforce a false "kindness" where people get rewarded with arbitrary pointsystems for making posts.
The discussions on those kinds of sites, like DA, never fucking stop because someone has to be the last person to say something.
"Your work is great!"
"Thank you very much!"
"You're welcome!"
"Thanks!"
"You're welcome"
ad nauseam.

So it's a love/hate relationship there. LOL smile

I always feel stupid giving feedback. Most of the time, I don't have something of substance to say. And  criticism seems rude, and not helpful mostly. But if I do say something in an album thread or whatever, it means I like it a lot. It means I overcame my fear of being banal, and posted anyway.

That's why Like buttons are good(like 8bc had), because I can express that I like it, without saying something specific.

125

(7 replies, posted in Releases)

Fm are yes

yoyz2k wrote:

Yes it was not well written, but the idea is simple.

You set global sound parameter for the first track and it sound nice to you. You want to stick with this sound but change parameter for each step.
You begin with the decay parameter.
You want it, sometime really short, sometime really long.
In this case, the interface allow you to only increase the decay parameter per step, you can not decrease it.

The obvious workaround to this is to set the decay to 0 to the track sound and set it manually for each step.
But it is not the same feeling, and it take more time for the user, so in the end, it is less used...
What could be really good, is "a kind" of bipolar value for the parameter change by step (-128,+128), not a (0,+128) like it is done today. I think you understand what I mean here. It is just ease of use.

In the end I think, people don't use this "parameter lock" feature to it's full potential.

Just a brief thougt, you could just let the per-step parameter override the instrument parameter, instead of adding. That would make it easy to set to zero (but that would essentially be"off" too, so, that might be a problem). As for precision, I've found on iOS that it's just best to decrease the sensitivity of the control; yeah it takes longer to get to 0 or 127, but the increased precision is worth it.

Of course you could also do some clever thing, where you change the precision based on swipe-speed. That would be killer.

TEOMAWKI wrote:
Ninten Kwon Do wrote:

e.s.c. has a point. I don't even publish my non dance chip because it isn't what people are into...but maybe that's a mistake?

This is pretty much me, and possibly why I kinda burned out on making new music.

Finding an audience is hard for anyone. You can either

A) Not care about finding an audience, in which case just make music that makes YOU happy.

B) Release music that sounds like everyone else, and almost surely get ignored.

C) Try to distinguish yourself with unique music.

Either way, do what makes you happy, because no one wants to hear your joyless dance music.

(Not that your dance music is joyless, just speaking  in generalities)

Detuned pulse waves are dark. That's how you let em know, shits going down.