17

(48 replies, posted in General Discussion)

calmdownkidder wrote:

"Maleficent Eletronic Musique Extravagance"  is clearly the name to go for.

I second the motion on the floor.
I move for a vote.
All in favor, yea or nea.

18

(48 replies, posted in General Discussion)

don't define. just live. just write. just enjoy.

this track reminded me of Beats of Rage with swagger x10, that's a good thing in my book

20

(12 replies, posted in Releases)

hotdamn

21

(16 replies, posted in General Discussion)

My sense (I could be wrong) is that most chip labels are currently holding themselves to a high quality level for new releases, which is why there hasn't been much probing for demos. Doesn't that mean they aren't accepting? You'd have to ask the netlabels.
Unless someone new really is bringing  quote fleckled, lit fire unquote (that's what the kids are saying, right?),
it hasn't been getting put out on netlabels, that I've seen.
But, I could be talking out of me bum. Don't refrain from educating me on what's happening on the chiplabel front, my dudes.
edit: There's also been good success with self releasing for some chip dudes recently who have been bringing fleckled, lit fire.
If you got fleckled, lit fire, who needs a netlabel?

22

(9 replies, posted in Releases)

a plus

23

(13 replies, posted in Collaborations)

only if you promise to whisper in my ear, "I'm vigorously curating this," when you review my track

25

(85 replies, posted in Collaborations)

*heavy breathing*

26

(7 replies, posted in Releases)

yep. me gusta.

27

(11 replies, posted in Bugs and Requests)

disregard, I'm definitely not a talking C

28

(11 replies, posted in Bugs and Requests)

I can now see that the website received a message.
I haven't had a direct conversation with anyone, but am I now a mod here?

29

(85 replies, posted in Collaborations)

deal

30

(85 replies, posted in Collaborations)

do we know when this is coming out?

EDIT: "chipmusic.org is toxic. Only good for lurking but any interactions leads to elitists ganging up on you and being assholes."
I just read that else where on the internet. I totally don't want to come off as someone who 'knows better' and is a poophead about it. My intent is conversation, not instruction.

I can see why you'd feel it would be nice for a gba clone on mobile.
But, as someone who's actively used nanoloop mobile at least once a week for fiveish years as my main way of producing music, I don't want the all the same features as the gba version.

(I've never talked directly to the creator, Oliver, but,) the draw back of 16 patterns/ 4 instruments-per-channel is likely intentional, and assuredly not as constricting as it appears on the surface.
I've heard people say, "Restriction breeds creativity." Every now and then, I consider learning other chip formats, but I keep finding new techniques and ideas to try inside nanoloop mobile.

I encourage exploration into the mobile version more, if you feel there needs to be more added to what's already there.
If you'd like, I would be more than happy to share saves with you for examples of thinking about the app's limitations differently.

I can't speak as much about the gba side of your op

32

(8 replies, posted in Nintendo Handhelds)

If you're that interested in doing a big cover project, what about using specifically a game boy interests you?
The joy is in the frustration.