Search options (Page 1 of 58)

zander wrote:

Hey!!! That is how I organize my chains as well Though I go 0-19 pv1 20-39 pv 2 ect.. ! I disagree with you jefftheworld. Just because he uses an organization pattern doesn't mean he HAS to stick with it. This format just makes it so the channels don't get cluttered. It also saves those instances where you can't find an unused phrase. Super easy. Super chill. A+

But most advanced sequencing would completely break those organizational rules constantly. How do you categorize a chain/phrase that comprises of drums, bass, echo of another channel and harmony? In most of my songs there are few, if any, phrases or tables that could fit into those categories, so it would take a lot of work to try to think of an organizational schema that would work for my style.

When I go back to a song that I wrote years ago it does take some time to remember the structure but it doesn't take long at all to remember it, maybe a couple plays all the way through? I think that's less time than creating and learning a generalized schema. Every song is different, so I'd rather not try to fit them all into one box.