yeah, its a short....
you've got a loose wire somewhere... it shouldn't be hard to fix.
opposite ends of the spectrum. stateless, yes... well, opposite ends of the anarchist spectrum. we only disagree for the most part on what the natural development in a stateless world would be... imposing capitalism would be awful in that system, as would imposing any communalist/syndicalist system... i would bet we don't disagree on very much... being that neither of us would want coercion to take part (hence, the commonality in the black part of the flag).
actually, ideally, i wouldn't be opposed to some sort of anarcho-syndicalism. but, in a stateless society, the development of a marketplace (capitalism dumbed down) would be bound to happen... at least in my theoretical approach. don't get me wrong though.... capitalism is very savage, and the economic system called by that name now is hardly what i wish for...
to be honest, i lean more towards generic left-libertarian than market anarchist... left-libertarian is just more inclusive... from agorists, to Rothbardians, to radical minarchists, to anarcho-capitalists, and even anarcho-communists... voluntaryism is by far my favorite political theory,
i could easily have changed the gold to green, or red even. but, the actions of human beings, i feel, in a stateless world merit the gold. its just the inevitable. not the ideal, for sure, but part of human nature.