If it changes in the gradual, Terry Riley way, the best way to know you did it right is to put it in front of and audience that understands it... I'm not sure where that kind of audience is right now.
Explaining what's happening is the key to working around people who don't understand, but that's the frustrating part. A listener might have played an instrument in school then quit, messed with Mixcraft and quit, or may have absolutely no knowledge about how music works at all.
Yeah, you got it. It's very much inspired by Autechre's recent output (ie. the long tracks on elseq), but more towards the side of Pan Sonic in terms of just being "planes" of sound that evolve slowly.
And yeah, the explanation is the frustrating part. Your comment is giving me an idea to take it in a somewhat more academic direction though, perhaps writing at length about the process, much like with "traditional" minimalist composition (and, carrying on, conceptually, from my game boy phase arrangement). At the end of the day, I'm still essentially making minimal techno, but perhaps the degree to which I've stripped things back isn't really appropriate for most people, unless they're into raster noton stuff or something
additional thought: probably doesn't help that most people who like the less typical artists tend to be less vocal about it than those who just want the standard dance fare... in the past when i'd get asked why i wasn't playing in whatever city, i'd tell people they'd have to express their interest to the people who book the shows
For sure. I've been asked that as well, and my response was "well, I didn't get asked". I would love to play international shows without having to weasel my way onto a lineup, but I'm continually puzzled as to how I'd get enough "pull" to do that.. even for my somewhat more accessible prog demoscene style music. But that's for another thread..
id totally listen to this and enjoyed the other stuff so much i posted about it http://www.kittenrock.co.uk/?p=981
ah yeah, thanks for that!