breakphase wrote:

I would like these albums if they were done well, pitchfork or not. But if you were a really good chip artist you wouldn't make a radiohead cover album. Right? Most cover albums around here are comps, because one person would'nt want to spend that much time covering one artist, straight. You'd want to re-interpret them or something. Which would be uninteresting to Pitchfork, unless it was done by Beck.

I would gladly sit down and cover all of Daft Punk's "Human After All" but I am not a really good chip artist.

You know, it's our fault for waiting for music press like pitchfork to throw us a bone when we know full well that they never have and never will understand electronic music (even the mainstream stuff). We have our own community, we are all self-made and we support each other, what's stopping us from doing our own music zine / blog dedicated to chip / experimental electronic / etc? If we had something like that we wouldn't need pitchfork.

And before anyone sugests that it's been done before, I do recall a couple times people tried to do chipmusic reviews and it was awful. Also if you are an artist in the scene you don't have that impartial journalistic integrity anyway. What I'm trying to say is, we should find our own music reviewers  that "get it" and support them.

659

(42 replies, posted in General Discussion)

pixls wrote:

yo, i get in 2nite a bit before the open mic, who wants to grab some quick food/maybe drinks around 8:30 or so?

:: raises hand ::

what's a good place nearby?

660

(38 replies, posted in Releases)

The "Daft Punk Alive 1997" of chipmusic.

this is chipmusic

eventually you just accept the fact that you are not danimal cannon and move on

662

(42 replies, posted in General Discussion)

bryface wrote:
Decktonic wrote:

I just had lunch with bryface. Highlight of blip for me.

It's all downhill from here.

p.s. we spent the whole time talking about how gameboys suck and DS10 is the future.

woah now don't put words in my mouth now son!  i got nothing but straight up straight love for teh GBz and all other platformz.  plenty of room for all of them this weekend.

I wasn't serious!

Bit Shifter wrote:

I don't think covers are the intrinsic problem. If I'm in a rock band and we decide to cover a song we like by an artist we like, out of a genuine appreciation for the song and an interest in "trying it on," we'll do it for those reasons. And, if we have any talent / ability and we're lucky, maybe we'll even succeed at creating a unique reinterpretation that respects the original without being a straight clone of it. Swap out the guitars & drums (or whatever) for chipmusic gear and I don't see anything changing that equation.

p.s. on second thought... do people have different expectations from electronic covers than they do from acoustic ones? Would Pitchfork feature a rock cover of a rock song that just sounds like the original? would they feature a chip cover of a rock song that tries to inject its own style or imagination into the original? would we call that a remix and not a cover?

Stenobot wrote:

@Bit Shifter: Word. There are some great chiptune covers out there. The bad ones are the ones that feel like they're just being "8-bit" for the sake of being 8-bit, and not injecting some originality and creativity into it. It's the equivelant approach of your standard dive bar cover band.

but to be fair, the vast majority of covers on Youtube are just that: 8-bit for the sake of being 8-bit. Then again, it's Youtube.

The problem is not these covers. It's that Pitchfork featured them.

665

(42 replies, posted in General Discussion)

egr wrote:

What's the typical % for tipping a cab driver?

those newer cabs with the credit card swiping screen in the backseat have pre-defined tipping amounts that usually start at 20%. If for any reason you want to tip less than that, you have to make sure to tap "other amount" or whatever the option is. But 20% is fair if the driver didn't get you killed.

666

(42 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I just had lunch with bryface. Highlight of blip for me.

It's all downhill from here.

p.s. we spent the whole time talking about how gameboys suck and DS10 is the future.

667

(31 replies, posted in General Discussion)

herr_prof wrote:

Here is the source

http://www.google.co.jp/logos/2012/moog.2.js

I guess it uses Flash for the sound? I'm working on HTML5 games at work and we've been talking about doing sound on mobile but it's hard. I was excited when I saw this but apparently it does not work on phones sad

668

(42 replies, posted in General Discussion)

if anyone is around the financial district (lower manhattan) we could totally meet up for lunch.

or dinner by the venue. who wants to meet up for dinner?

you are all suckers for listening to these. I'm not even gonna click play. ::swag::

670

(31 replies, posted in General Discussion)

http://www.google.com.au/

Google Moog Compilation... go!

DEADBEATBLAST wrote:

w/ mustard.

also this.

I'm still waiting for someone _not_ on this comp to post in this thread...