1,489

(21 replies, posted in Bugs and Requests)

trash80 wrote:

oh and this was done today just so you know... (url formatting for users)
http://chipmusic.org/an-cat-max/music so things are slowly coming together. and by slowly I mean pretty fast considering we just launched the site 2 & 1/2 weeks ago

Something like:

would be useful in my opinion. Since http://www.chipmusic.org/trash80/music already exists, I can't imagine it would be too hard to add a link to the profiles (maybe I'm wrong, though). smile

I already heard Subway Sonicbeat's track, it's great, now I will download the rest. smile

Dot.AY wrote:

Assigning MIDI controls: amazingly quick, go into midi learn mode and almost every button or variable can be assigned to a MIDI controller (I am well aware other software does this but nothing as elegant and simple as ableton)

In FL Studio, you click the "MIDI learn" button, twist any knob on screen, and then twist a knob on your MIDI controller, and it's done, and takes effect instantly. Does it really get more elegant and simple than that?

[20:42:01] <Theta_Frost> hey ant1
[20:42:18] <Theta_Frost> you should post your little pc engine thread on chipmusic d00d

PC Engine is without a doubt the best sounding console ever created (in my opinion), and using it will make your chip music sound better. tongue

So here's a collection of tools (MML compiler, wave editor, player, stuff), music and documentation I put together for people who are new to it.

zip

This stuff is windows only, although you can do it on a mac too. If you have any questions, or it doesn't work or you hate me then just post it in this thread or something. smile

1,493

(96 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Yes, making music for fun and getting famous as a result is very different to making music to get famous and having fun as result. Re: 8bitweapon, I don't think everyone who makes music is doing it to get attention - I suspect mostly, people make a song for enjoyment, and then listen and decide they want to share it on the internet, rather than sitting down and saying to themselves "now I will make a song to upload at chipmusic.org".

1,494

(22 replies, posted in Atari)

akira^8GB wrote:

I got confused at first too and this is only to blame to the 'community'  as a whole.
Usually, the main CPU of the machine that hosts the synthesizer is the one that dictaminates if it's "8-bit" or not. The Atari ST has a 16 bit processor so it obviously leads to confusions. Is YM music really 8-bit music by 'our' definition? If we are changing all the time, we will get confused wink

(the SID is not really an 8-bit chip, if we are looking only at the soundchip...)

Well, MSX2 (yes, I know this thread is about Atari, I just like to be pedantic wink) has YM2149 and Z80 processor, so there's still a few "8-bit YM2149 musicians", whichever way you look at it. tongue

edit: and also "8-bit YM2149 musicians" is ambiguous enough to mean either "musicians using the 8-bit YM2149" as well as "8-bit musicians using the YM2149", so I think there is no problem. Sorry for the off topic!!

1,495

(22 replies, posted in Atari)

aent wrote:
Atari Music Network wrote:

8-bit YM2149 musicians

I don't wanna be a boring negative moaner, but I believe there's no such thing.

What do you mean? I don't understand. It's an 8-bit chip. It has 8-bit registers and an 8-bit data bus.

1,496

(96 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I don't like their music but I don't really mind if they want to make money from it.

J. Arthur Keenes wrote:
arlen wrote:

Yeah I couldn't care less. They were pretty gimmicky.

people always fuck this up

I always thought "I could care less" was just the American way of saying it, haha.

1,497

(8 replies, posted in Motion Graphics)

Hehe, an automated databending tool? I'm glad we don't have an Image section here, then. Cool little experiment though! smile

1,498

(36 replies, posted in Nintendo Consoles)

Maybe you have to build it yourself - there are makefiles in there so I guess it won't be too hard. I have no idea what it all is though, I don't have a Mac, I just assumed it was what Big-Chip said it was. Sorry if it's the wrong stuff! sad

Maybe Big-Chip will see this thread and explain. smile

I use Psycle sometimes, it's a really similar tracker, I think it can even use the same Machines (as well as VSTs and samples).

neilbaldwin wrote:

Debate?

Oh, me and Arlen were discussing in IRC whether or not NSF export was possible - it's nothing! smile

1,501

(36 replies, posted in Nintendo Consoles)

Here you go (from Big-Chip's site). smile

Hehe, finally we can have an answer to our debate from months ago! tongue

Schism tracker also runs on Mac. Sunvox is a good suggestion. If you have DosBox and it works nicely then there's a whole load of trackers you can run in there, so you should try that out too.

1,504

(46 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

boring machine wrote:

Yes indeed, but what defines nanoloop for me is more the interface and the sequencer (more precisely, the way you interact with the sequencer). If this was supposed to be a completely different beast, I suppose Oliver would have chosen a different name smile.

If what defines it is the interface, why do you care that the sound is different?