It's great that chip music doesn't need Malcolm Mclaren to get places.
These guys own and they've worked hard to get this kind of attention. Good guys done good.
chipmusic.org is an online community in respect and relation to chip music, art and its parallels.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
ChipMusic.org / Forums / Posts by ForaBrokenEarth
It's great that chip music doesn't need Malcolm Mclaren to get places.
These guys own and they've worked hard to get this kind of attention. Good guys done good.
Where did you get the tablecloth?
I make downtempo, wonky, ambient shit with a lo-fi aesthetic when I'm not making chip or rock music. I'm also a regularly recurring member of John Richards Dirty Electronics Ensemble and I've played with Chris Carter (Formerly of Throbbing Gristle), DJ Sniff from STIEM, and Anna Meredith.
Seriously though, it's actually just based on the dreams the creator had. It was actually a very limited release and came with a book that had excerpts from the guys actual dream diary, along with original sketches.
I'm sure I've got a .pdf of it somewhere.
Talking of Dream Diarys. Play Yume Nikki.
eme7h wrote:Acid is not so expensive.
Yeah, but where I live, it's a pain in the ass to find a reliable dealer for the stuff. My main one only sells bud and coke, the latter of which, I have no interest in.
Lel.
LSD in leicester.
everyone knows you have to leave it alone so you can put RAW LSDJ in your song description.
Meh. I always just considered that the Chip version of [DEMO].
my.Explosion wrote:So far most of my chiptunes have been raw output. On some tracks I may add a slight, *slight* reverb. It's not often noticeable at all, but I think it gives it a little more "softness".
My general thinking is: if the track sounds good raw, no need to make more of it. Don't fix it if it ain't broken.
Some sorts of tracks generally just seem to do better raw, too. Crazy noisy chipthrash shit, etc.
It depends on your audience as well. The harsher your production the less likely it is to appeal to more casual listeners, but people more involved with chip will be more likely to give it a chance.
Now I've started using grooves a lot its harder to align individual tracks for mixing, so I've been practicing just making it sound as good as possible on the hardware and recording straight. It's something you should probably do anyway, but I occasionally find myself being lazy about things if I think can sort them out later on. A tiny bit of reverb never hurt anyone.
The actual, compression aspect of mastering can feel a bit redundant when gameboys have such naturally limited dynamics.
One day, anything from aanaaanaaanaaana is going to be the tracker equivalent of the obscure, weird soul 45's collectors kill each other over.
I especially enjoy that you made all these yourself and used a throw away.
aanaaanaaanaaana.net :: initiate legitimacy ritual
Honestly, it's the "tune" bit. It sounds like all chipmusic comprises of is fun little ditties. So I annoyingly insist on using Chipmusic at all times.
Chiptune as a verb is annoying because it delegitimizes chipmusic by separating it from other kinds of music unnecessarily.
Yamaha FB01. Bitch to edit sometimes but gorgeous once you get it open.
stop calling things 'fakebit'
For the sake of the intended discussion...
Another real question: Why are the concert goers at the venues tolerating this shit as if it actually didn't matter?
and a juxtaposed one: Why can't the general public tell the difference between an objectively good live classical performance and a bad one?
Overly serious wall of text answer:
The reason that the general public can't tell a good classical performance from a bad one is that taste develops from exposure. If you haven't been exposed to classical music, you won't be able to make judgements about it in ways that are relevant to classical music.
"I can't dance to this."
"Where are the lyrics?"
"wheres the beat?"
These are all questions from the perspective of someone who's only framework for understanding music is pop or rock, and they are largely irrelevant in terms of value when asked about classical music. You get the exact same thing with jazz.
What I would propose is that en masse, the anonymous silent blob of "chiptune" fans are actually pop/rock music fans. These aren't the type to sit on here or ucollective and chat about gear or fancy ways of using PWM to create interesting inflections of sound. These people's exposure is mostly to popular music, maybe EDM, with "chiptune" largely meaning "squarewaves/videogamereferences". The concert goers "tolerate" it (if you must phrase it that way) because the lens they see music through is poppy-dancey-rock and so they like it to sound, and be produced like that. The average listener doesn't have the exposure to know otherwise, and they most likely don't care.
I make music that integrates Chip hardware, DAW's and traditional instruments. I mostly write tracker music as practice for my other music because it gives me another perspective and interesting material to incorporate elsewhere that I couldn't make otherwise. I'm quite happy to point out that the majority of the music I make is Alternative Rock with chip music elements, and it's meant to be view through the lens of alt rock, rather than purist chipmusic. I'd hope that wouldn't exclude me from too many shows, because I mostly avoid the "OMG CHIP GAMEBOYS AND HEARTS 8BIT FOR LIFE" thing altogether,
ChipMusic.org / Forums / Posts by ForaBrokenEarth