The little 4 track cassette recorders tend to (ham-handedly) do some of your EQ  work for you with a lot of chip stuff i've found

18

(3 replies, posted in Audio Production)

why not use a plugin? it doesn't make a ton of sense to me to run something like this in series in your recording chain. will just be an extra bit of noise...

you could just run a second monitor on your computer and pull up any number of free spectrum plugins and you have effectively the same thing?

Bluecat has a pretty good free suite for this stuff

your videos are really well done!

Robin wrote:

This probably sounds dumb, but when saving my tracks as mp3s, what bitrate is most suitable for music made on a DS? (I'm using 128, but I'm thinking maybe I don't need such a high rate for such lo fi music?)

How are you planning on releasing these recordings?

Unless there is a particular codec you're set on, it shouldn't be necessary to convert your lossless to MP3. Most release platforms will handle the conversion themselves (bandcamp etc.)

Also, 128 definitely is not a "high rate" it's pretty antiquated and there will be noticeable distortion introduced to your music, easiest to hear in quiet sections that will sound unnaturally "warbly"

Normalize your mixes is a good idea as well. If you're looking for a mix straight from your DS without any buss processing then just normalize to somewhere around -.3 dBFS

Spaces left before or after a recording is to taste. Small bits of added silence can help differentiate your music from music played before or after it on an iPod or some playback device. CD's are typically set up to automatically insert 2 secs of silence between tracks, so you if you're planning making CD's it may be less necessary.

A stereo TRS cable is good, just try a different one than the one you are using to see if that specific cable is the problem, they can go bad pretty easily

Giusv wrote:

Ok. I'll try unbalanced cables. Thank you very much smile smile

Not exactly what I meant, but yeah, try a new aux cable

there aren't really "balanced" stereo trs cables. there are balanced mono TRS cables and stereo TRS cables. This doesn't sound like the problem though.

Have you just tried a new cable?

cool!

Boosting 50 hz seems like the wrong way to go if you're looking for punchiness. I would try gentle high pass starting at 40 hz and a shallow cut at 200-250 hz, then see if you like the sound better

i'm not sure any of the parts could really be considered a melody line except maybe the bit at the end?

everything loops at 2 measures, so you what you have now is basically textural. that could be cool if you commit to it and really fill up the arrangement, or you could use it as a bed for a longer progression that moves the piece somewhere.

27

(14 replies, posted in Audio Production)

http://www.mediafire.com/download/4rlqw … s_copy.zip

28

(14 replies, posted in Audio Production)

barbeque wrote:

can somebody host a .zip of this ?? not able to dl from anywhere

i'd be happy to put one up w/ op's approval. if not i could PM you a link?

do you get the same hum if you record off of something like an ipod?

herr_prof wrote:

I disagree, you can mix just fine on a good song on the stereo recording.

Not saying you can't make a good mix out of lsdj, just not as modern of a mix (aka complex stereo field, surgical parameter automation, submix processing, effects, track eq, etc.)

plenty of awesome recordings have been made over the years without any of that stuff, but avoiding them definitely gives a certain vintage quality, which isn't necessarily bad or displeasing and definitely more "gameboy".

generally you'll want to multitrack if you're looking to get a modern sounding mix out of LSDJ

just write a bunch of "songs" in the same key or tempo or like related keys and then figure out some graceful transitions and modulations and junk